Cancer Cures Itself

Cancer Cures Itself

Raena Morgan: Andreas, why do you say in your book that most cancers, if not all, will disappear by themselves? What about medical intervention?

Andreas Moritz: Well, as I mentioned, the body produces cancer cells all the time, and Continue reading

Discover a Common Yard Weed that’s Proven to Kill Cancer Cells

By: Paul Fassa

Most natural health advocates know that dandelion is a good liver tonic. But now research is showing that it’s also a cancer fighter. This research discovery occurred at Windsor University in Windsor, Canada.

A Windsor University biochemist, Siyaram Pandey, Continue reading

Breaking News: Cancer Drugs Make Tumors More Aggressive and Deadly

By: S. L. Baker

When natural health advocates warn against mainstream medicine’s arsenal of weapons used to fight cancer, including chemotherapy and radiation, their concerns often revolve around how these therapies can weaken and damage a person’s body in numerous ways. Continue reading

Letting Go Of The Need To Fight In Life Reprograms The DNA Of The Body

By Andreas Moritz

All events in life that appear to be negative are in fact unique opportunities to become more complete and whole inside, and to move forward in life. Whenever we need to give ourselves more love, time and appreciation, but fail to fulfill these essential needs, there will be someone or something in our life that pushes us in that direction. Feeling rejected by or being disappointed and angry with another person highlights a lack in taking responsibility for the negative things that happen to us. Blaming someone else or oneself for an unfortunate situation results in the feeling of being a victim of sorts and is likely to manifest as disease.
Continue reading

Why Do Most People Believe That Cancer Is A Disease?

By Andreas Moritz

Everyone has the capacity to heal themselves

There is no cancer that has not been survived by someone, regardless of how far advanced it was. If even one person has succeeded in healing his cancer, there must be a mechanism for it, just as there is a mechanism for creating cancer. Every person on the planet has the capacity to do both. If you have been diagnosed with cancer, you may not be able to change the diagnosis, but it is certainly in your power to alter the destructive consequences that it (the diagnosis) may have on you. The way you perceive the cancer and the steps you choose to take following the diagnosis are some of the most powerful determinants of your future wellness, or the lack of it.

90-95 percent of all cancers appear and disappear of their own accord

The indiscriminate reference to cancer as a ‘killer disease’ by professionals and lay people alike has turned cancer into a disorder with tragic consequences for the majority of today’s cancer patients and their families. Cancer has become synonymous with extraordinary suffering, pain, and death. This perception continues despite the fact that 90-95 percent of all cancers appear and disappear of their own accord. Not a day passes without the body making millions of cancer cells. Some people, under severe temporary stress, make more cancer cells than usual and form clusters of cancerous cells that disappear again once they feel better.

According to medical research, secretions of the DNA’s powerful anticancer drug, Interleukin II, drop under physical and mental duress and increase again when the person becomes relaxed and joyful. Low secretions of Interleukin II increase the incidence of cancer in the body. However, people are generally not under severe stress all the time. Therefore, most cancers vanish without any form of medical intervention and without causing any real harm. Right at this moment, millions of people are walking around with cancers in their body without having a clue that they have them. Likewise, millions of people heal their cancers without even knowing it. Overall, there are many more spontaneous remissions of cancer than there are diagnosed and treated cancers.

Cancer treatments do more harm than good

The truth is, relatively few cancers actually become ‘terminal’ or are even detected. The vast majority of cancers remain undiagnosed and are not found until autopsy. Typically, these people don’t die because of cancer. They don’t even have symptoms that could prompt the doctor to prescribe any of the standard cancer-detecting tests. It should raise everyone’s eyebrows that 30-40 times as many cases of thyroid, pancreatic, and prostate cancer are found in autopsy than are detected by doctors. The British medical journal Lancet published a study in 1993 that showed early screening often leads to unnecessary treatment. The reason for that? Although 33 percent of autopsies reveal prostate cancer, only 1 percent die from it. After age 75, half of the males may have prostate cancer, but only 2 percent die from it. New official recommendations (August 2008) call for oncologists to no longer treat men with prostate cancer past the age of 75 years because the treatments do more harm than good and offer no advantages over no treatment at all.

It must be noted that these low mortality rates only apply to those who have neither been diagnosed with cancer nor received any treatment for cancer. Mortality rates, however, increase drastically if cancers are being diagnosed and treated, which clearly shows what does the killing. Once diagnosed, the vast majority of cancers are never given a chance to disappear on their own. They are promptly targeted with an arsenal of deadly weapons such as chemotherapy drugs, radiation, and the surgical knife. ‘Sleeping’ tumors that would never really cause much harm to the body, may now be aroused into powerful defensive reactions and become aggressive, not unlike relatively harmless bacteria that turn into dangerous superbugs when attacked by antibiotic medication. It makes absolutely no sense that at a time when you need to strengthen the body’s most important healing system – the immune system – you would subject yourself to radical treatments that actually weaken or destroy the immune system.

The problem with cancer patients is that, terrified by the diagnosis, they submit their bodies to these cutting/burning/poisoning procedures that, more likely than not, will lead them more rapidly to the day of final sentencing: “We have to tell you with our deepest regret that there is nothing more that can be done to help you.”

The most pressing question is not, “How advanced or dangerous is my cancer?” but, “What am I doing or not doing that puts my body into a situation of having to fight for its life?” Why do some people go through cancer as if it were the flu? Are they just lucky, or is there a mechanism at work that triggers the healing? On the contrary, what is the hidden element that prevents the body from healing cancer naturally, that makes cancer so dangerous, if indeed it is dangerous at all?

People believe cancer is a vicious killer

The answers to all these queries lie with the person who has the cancer, and does not depend on the degree of a particular cancer’s ‘viciousness’ or the advanced stage to which it appears to have progressed. Do you believe that cancer is a disease? You will most likely answer, “Yes,” given the ‘informed’ opinion that the medical industry and mass media have fed to the masses for many decades. Yet, the more important but rarely asked question remains, “Why do you think cancer is a disease?” You may answer, “Because I know cancer kills people every day.” I would then question you further, “How do you know that it is the cancer that kills people?” You would probably argue that most people who have cancer die, so obviously it must be the cancer that kills them. Besides, you may reason, all the expert doctors tell us so.

Let me ask you another question, a rather strange one: “How do you know for sure that you are the daughter/son of your father and not of another man?” Is it because your mother told you so? What makes you think that your mother told you the truth? Probably because you believe her; and you have no reason not to. After all, she is your mother, and mothers do not lie about these things. Or do they? Although you will never really know with absolute certainty that the person you believe to be your father is, in fact, your father, you nevertheless have turned what you subjectively believe into something that you ‘know’, into an irrefutable truth.

Although no scientific proof whatsoever exists to show that cancer is a disease (versus a healing attempt), most people will insist that it is a disease because this is what they have been told to believe. Yet this belief is only hearsay based on other people’s opinions. These other people heard the same ‘truth’ from someone else. Eventually, the infallible doctrine that cancer is a disease can be traced to some doctors who expressed their subjective feelings or beliefs about what they had observed and published them in some review articles or medical reports. Other doctors agreed with their opinion, and before long, it became a ‘well-established fact’ that cancer is a vicious illness that somehow gets hold of people in order to kill them. However, the truth of the matter may actually be quite different and more rational and scientific than that.

This is an excerpt from my book CANCER IS NOT A DISEASE! – IT’S A SURVIVAL MECHANISM

You may share or republish this article provided you clearly mention the name of Andreas Moritz and paste a hyper link back to the web page

The Wisdom Of The Cancer Cells Ensures That Cancer Is Not A Killer Disease

By Andreas Moritz 

What Is Cancer?

According to our current medical model, cancer is a general term that describes a group of 100 unique diseases that share one common factor: uncontrolled growth and spread of abnormal cells. Our body naturally produces more cells when it needs them. For example, every person who has done muscle training or exercised regularly knows that his muscles have become larger. However, we would not call the extra cell tissues that the body forms in response to an increased need for muscle power to be an abnormal growth or tumor. However, if cells begin to divide without an apparent need for more cells, they will form an excess mass of tissue which is considered a tumor. If the tumor is ‘malignant’, doctors refer to it as cancerous.

For as long as the basic underlying mechanisms leading up to cancer are not known and dealt with properly, cancer will remain a mystery disease. Cancer is a puzzling phenomenon that has (falsely) been labeled an ‘autoimmune disease’, a disease that allegedly turns the body against itself. The truth is far from that. The body has been designed to sustain its life for as long as possible. Even the so-called ‘death gene’ has only one purpose, that is, to keep the body from self-destructing. Death genes are there to make sure cells die at the end of their normal lifespan and are replaced with new ones.

If the body is designed to live and not to destroy itself, why then would it suddenly allow the growth of extra cell tissue and kill itself? This does not make any sense at all. The main obstacle to finding real cures for cancer is that modern cancer treatment is rooted in the false assumption that the body sometimes tries to destroy itself. Medical students are trained to understand the mechanism of disease development, but they are left in the dark concerning the origins of disease. Viewed superficially, to the students, an illness appears to be something destructive and harmful to the body. Seen from a deeper perspective, however, the same illness is but an attempt by the body to cleanse and heal itself, or at least, to prolong its life.

Since the medical textbooks offer few insights into the true causes of illness, it is understandable that the majority of doctors today believe that the body has self-destructive, and even suicidal abilities or tendencies. Claiming to be non-superstitious and objective, they inadvertently admit that certain cells suddenly decide to malfunction, become malicious, and randomly attack other cells and organs in the body. Based on this purely subjective and unsubstantiated belief, the doctor and his patient alike become almost obsessed with trying to protect the body from itself. Yet despite such undisputed notions of ‘truth’, none of this means that the body does, in fact, attempt or cause its own destruction. Would it actually astound you if I told you that cancer has never killed a person?

Wisdom of the Cancer Cells

Cancer cells are not part of a malicious disease process. When cancer cells ‘spread’ (metastasize), it is not their purpose or goal to disrupt the body’s vital functions, infect healthy cells, and obliterate their host (the body). Self-destruction is not the theme of any cell unless, of course, it is old, worn-out, and ready to be turned-over. It has never been proven that cancer cells move around the body and indiscriminately form new colonies of cancer cells throughout the body. Rather, new colonies may grow for the same reasons the previous ones did. Cancer cells, like all other cells, know that if the body dies, they will die as well.

Just because most doctors and patients assume that cancer cells are out to destroy the body does not mean that cancer cells actually have such a purpose or ability. A cancerous tumor is neither the cause of progressive destruction nor does it actually lead to the death of the body. There is nothing in a cancer cell that even remotely has the ability to kill anything. If you asked people walking in the street if they knew how cancer kills people, you would probably not get one definite, correct answer. Ask the same question of doctors and you may not get a much better result. You are unlikely to hear that cancer doesn’t kill anyone.

Contrary to hearsay, what eventually leads to the demise of an organ or the entire body is the wasting away of healthy cell tissue, which results from a continued deprivation of nutrients and life force. The drastic reduction or shutdown of vital nutrient supplies to the cells of an organ is not primarily a consequence of a cancerous tumor, but actually its biggest cause.

By definition, a cancer cell is a normal, healthy cell that has undergone genetic mutation to the point that it can live in anaerobic surroundings (an environment where oxygen is not available). In other words, if you deprive a group of cells of vital oxygen (their primary source of energy), some of them will die, but others will manage to alter their genetic software program and mutate in a most ingenious way: the cells will become able to live without oxygen and will adapt to derive some of their energy needs from such things as cellular metabolic waste products.

It may be easier to understand the cancer cells’ phenomenon when comparing it with the behavior of common microorganisms. Bacteria, for example, are divided into two main groups, aerobic and anaerobic, meaning those that need to use oxygen and those that can live without it; and there are also some specialized bacteria that are both aerobic and anaerobic.This is important to understand, since we have more bacteria in our body than we have cells. Aerobic bacteria thrive in an oxygenated environment. They are responsible for helping us with the digestion of food and with the manufacturing of important nutrients, such as B-vitamins. Anaerobic bacteria, on the other hand, can appear and thrive only in an environment where oxygen does not reach. They break down waste materials, toxic deposits, and dead, worn-out cells.

This is an excerpt from my book CANCER IS NOT A DISEASE! – IT’S A SURVIVAL MECHANISM

You may share or republish this article provided you clearly mention the name of Andreas Moritz and paste a hyperlink back to the web page

The Amazing Role of Germs And Infections

By Andreas Moritz 

Destructive bacteria naturally increase in larger numbers wherever excessive waste matter accumulates and requires decomposition. Have you ever wondered why we have more bacteria in our body than we have cells? Most bacteria are produced inside the body, whereas relatively few enter it from the outside. The body also ‘grows’ bacteria from tiny, indestructible colloids of life in our blood and cells.One of the world’s most ingenuous medical researchers, Professor Antoine Bechamp (1816-1908), called these tiny cellular compounds microzyma. The German scientist, Dr. Günther Enderlein, who published papers on this research in 1921 and 1925, referred to them as protits. Protits are tiny dots in the blood and cells that you can apparently see with any microscope. These dots or colloids of life are virtually indestructible and survive even after the body dies.

According to the phenomenon known as pleomorphism, these protits develop or change form in response to a changing condition (acid/base balance) of the blood or cell milieu. As the cells’ environment becomes acidified and toxic, the protits turn into microorganisms that are designed to break down and remove dead cells, toxins, and metabolic waste-products that the body is unable to remove. If further destruction of dead, weak cells and other waste is required, the protits become viruses and, eventually, fungi.

You may know how difficult it can be to get rid of a toenail/foot-fungus. Fungi only go after dead, organic matter. The presence of congested and half-decayed or dead toe tissue practically forces the body to produce and/or attract more and more fungi to help decompose the lifeless parts of the foot.

As you might know, cancer cells are filled with all sorts of microorganisms. Allopathic medicine does not really explain how they get into the cells, unless they are viral. Most doctors assume that the germs come from the outside, but this assumption is unproved (and was even disputed by Louis Pasteur himself, who invented the germ theory).

As the brilliant scientists Bechamp and Enderlein demonstrated, these germs are created inside the cells in response to the presence of toxic waste material that the body is unable to remove. They may also attach themselves to other weak, undernourished cell tissue (particularly cells that suffer from poor oxygenation). Their purpose is to decompose these damaged, weak cells. This microbial activity is commonly known as ‘infection’. Like cancer, however, an infection is not a disease. Rather, it is a sophisticated, combined attempt by the body and microbes to avert the suffocation and poisoning caused by accumulated toxic waste material in its tissues, the lymphatic system, or the blood.

If you piled up kitchen garbage in one area of your house, it would attract a lot of flies and bacteria, and this would generate a foul-smelling odor. You would certainly not blame the flies and bacteria for the stench. They are just trying to digest some of the garbage. Likewise, those microbes that are attracted to or produced inside unhealthy cells are not part of the problem; they are part of the solution to the problem.

An infection, if properly supported by natural approaches of cleansing and nourishment, can practically prevent the genetic mutation of aerobic cells into cancer cells. Cancer and infection share some of the same original causes. For this reason, a significant number of cancer patients who suffer a major infection such as the chickenpox go into total remission and are subsequently found cancer-free once the infection has passed.

According to over 150 studies conducted in the past 100 or more years, spontaneous tumor regression has followed bacterial, fungal, viral, and protozoal infections. During episodes of fever, tumors literally break up, and the cancer cells are promptly removed via the lymphatic system and other organs of elimination.

During such a major infection-which is nothing but an appropriate healing response initiated by bacteria and the immune system-a considerable amount of toxic waste is broken down and removed from the body. This, once again, permits oxygen to reach the oxygen-deprived cells. Upon contact with the oxygen, the cancer cells die or otherwise mutate back into normal cells. The tumors have no more reason to be there, hence, the occurrence of spontaneous remission of cancer in these patients. In some cases, brain tumors as large as the size of an egg have literally disappeared in this way within 24 hours.

The standard approach of suppressing infection and its resultant fever among hospital patients is medical malpractice and stands responsible for the loss of millions of lives that could easily have been saved by letting nature do its job.

This is an excerpt from my book CANCER IS NOT A DISEASE! – IT’S A SURVIVAL MECHANISM

You may share or republish this article provided you clearly mention the name of Andreas Moritz and paste a hyperlink back to the web page

Germs Don’t Cause Cancer

By Andreas Moritz 

The germs involved in an infection become active and infectious only when physical impurities and waste matter have gathered or tissue damage has already occurred. This is true whether they are of a bacterial or viral origin and whether they are generated within the body or introduced from the external environment. Destructive microorganisms (those involved in an infection) simply have no business in a clean, well-circulated, and oxygen-rich environment. There is nothing to be disposed of, and no immune response is necessary (fever, swelling of the lymph nodes, an increase of immune cells, or other such self-defensive measures) to protect the body.

Even if harmful germs were to enter cell tissue in a healthy body, they would do it no harm. A virus simply cannot penetrate into the nucleus of a well-oxygenated cell because exposure to oxygen would kill it. A well-oxygenated cell also produces powerful anti-viral drugs, such as interferon. If for some reason a virus has made contact with a cell, but its presence is not beneficial to the body, the virus will be destroyed by the cell’s defense mechanisms or the general immune system. Viruses do not help cells mutate into cancer cells, unless this is in the best interest of the body. We should not fall into the trap of misinterpreting this to be an act of self-destruction. It is important to recall at this point that cancer is not a disease but a survival mechanism that occurs only when all other protective measures have failed.

There is profound purpose and intelligence at every level of physical creation, from the smallest of particles to the most complex star clusters in the large-scale universe. Just because many scientists and doctors prefer to see nature as behaving in a random, incoherent fashion does not mean it actually is chaotic and unpredictable. Cancer is not as chaotic as the “experts” would have us believe. It has as much purpose and meaning as does a virus or bacterium. A virus only infects the nucleus of a cell that is on the verge of becoming anaerobic. To find virus material in cancer cells is, therefore, not proof that viruses cause cancer. In fact, viruses try to prevent the demise of the body. They are created for the body and by the body. It is completely normal for weak, deteriorating cells to transform their protits colloids into bacteria, viruses, and fungi to help prevent more damage to the body than has already occurred due to the accumulation of toxic waste matter.

Suppressing an infection, such as chickenpox, with germ-killing medication destroys much of the germ population. However, it is the germ population that helps to stimulate a much-needed immune response to rid the body of cancer-causing toxins. Modern vaccination programs are largely responsible for the significant deterioration of natural immunity among the vaccinated populations around the world today. The body does not acquire real immunity to infectious diseases by exposing it to vaccines (antibody production alone does not create immunity); in fact, with each vaccine the immune system becomes more depleted.

New vaccines that, for example, are said to prevent cervical cancer (connected with the human papilloma virus or HPV) merely force the body to move toxins into other areas. This may give rise to the appearance that the “enemy” is dead and the body is now cured and safe. Not by a long shot! The short-term gain of becoming symptom-free through the use of such magic bullet approaches can have serious repercussions in the long-term. These treatments aimed at producing a quick symptomatic relief actually prevent the body from employing the assistance of destructive microbes to help break down and remove deposits in the body that resemble nuclear waste.

The toxic waste and cell debris gathered in the body can act like a time bomb, but most people do not want to hear it ticking. They stick their heads in the sand, hoping that somehow the problem will simply go away. However, when the ticking becomes too unnerving and frightening (symptoms), the resulting visit to the doctor will lead to the smashing of the timing device, but will leave the bomb intact. Hence, it is just a matter of time before the bomb explodes; only this time, since the clock is now gone, there won’t be much of a warning. On the other hand, allowing the body to receive assistance from destructive germs may not only defuse the time bomb but also dismantle it. The toxic secretions from these microbes prompt the immune system to launch a preemptive strike against potential cancer formation. A spontaneous remission of cancer is not a rare miracle. It happens in millions of people who unknowingly diffuse these “time bombs” through an infection, such as the simple cold or flu. This is how 95 percent of all cancers come and go without any medical intervention.

Based on current statistical information, we can estimate that treating cancer with suppressive methods, e.g. radiation, chemotherapy, and surgery, reduces the chance of complete remission from 28% percent to 7% or less. In other words, medical treatment is responsible for the deaths of at least 21,000 people in every 100,000 cancer patients! These 21,000 people would recover if they did not receive any treatment at all. According to the American Cancer Society’s estimated 2008 cancer mortality rates, 565,650 men and women will die from cancer this year (2008). That’s 6,000 deaths more than in 2007. In a country that supposedly has the most advanced and successful medical system in the world, this trend clearly shows that the currently applied symptom-oriented approaches to cancer are heavily flawed and in fact, have failed.

This is an excerpt from my book CANCER IS NOT A DISEASE! – IT’S A SURVIVAL MECHANISM

You may share or republish this article provided you clearly mention the name of Andreas Moritz and paste a hyperlink back to the web page

Lymph Node Removal for Breast Cancer Is Useless and Harmful

By Andreas Moritz

Surgical removal of lymph nodes and lymph vessels as part of standard medical procedure for breast cancer patients is not just useless, but also harmful, according to a new study published in The Journal of the American Medical Association

In this groundbreaking study, The American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z0011 trial, 115 medical centers followed 891 women with early breast cancer and looked at the benefits of lymph node removal. The participants’ median age was in the mid-50s, and they were followed for a median of 6.3 years.

The study found that in those women who had breast cancer that had spread to the lymph nodes, the removal of the nodes not only failed to increase their survival rate, but also fueled their chances of suffering serious harm. In fact, women in the study who had nodes removed experienced a 70 percent increase in complications compared with a 25 percent increase in women who did not. Such complications included infections, pain sensations and lymph edema.

What’s astounding to the medical community, the researchers discovered that lymph node removal did not prevent the further spread of cancer to other lymph nodes. This clearly defies the hypothesis that lymph nodes harboring cancer cells are responsible for metastasis (spreading of cancer).

This is the rationale behind common medical belief: “By removing a lymph node that contains cancer cells, these cells can no longer spread to other lymph nodes, or reach other parts of the body. Thus, the practice of removing lymph nodes is a reliable and effective preventive method against cancer metastasis.” This sounds logical and reasonable to most medical doctors and their patients. However, the theory only makes sense if you also believe that cancer cells move around to infect other cells and make them cancerous, too. But, of course, this is just another hypothesis that lacks scientific backing.

As the above study clearly proves, the cutting out of these nodes that contain cancerous cells does nothing to prevent cancer from spreading. What we must therefore conclude from this research is that cancer does not spread from one place to another.

To follow medical logic, if you remove the lymph nodes along with the cancer cells, cancer cells can no longer spread or return because they are all gone. Without the pathways of metastasis, lymph nodes and lymph vessels, cancer remains contained, or so the theory goes. However, what oncologists don’t want to admit is that new cancer cells don’t spread, but instead grow in different places in the body for the same reasons the original cancer developed. Bottom line, the current cancer theory has to be rewritten. In addition, cutting out lymph vessels should be ruled intentional medical malpractice.

This medical procedure has been a standard ‘medical’ practice for 100 years, although there has actually never been a clinical study to support it. Mainstream medicine is increasingly seen for its quackery practices, where a lot of money is being made from unsuspecting people who fear for their lives and willingly submit to such radical treatments.

I have always spoken out against removing those vitally important parts of the body’s detoxification and waste removal system, which includes lymph vessels and lymph nodes. Breast cancer patients, especially, depend on an intact lymphatic system. And so I feel very encouraged by this team of researchers who had the courage to conduct such an important study and openly expose one of the oldest and cruelest medical procedures as a scam.

With no difference in rate of survival or recurrence, removing lymph nodes is NOT justified. Study authors, Dr. Grant Walter Carlson and Dr. William C. Wood, stated that the research conducted “definitively showed that auxiliary lymph node dissection is not beneficial.”

Furthermore, “survival was independent of lymph node status,” said the study authors. Why take women through such a taxing ordeal when there is no survival benefit?

“This is such a radical change in thought that it’s been hard for many people to get their heads around it,” reported another study author, Dr. Monica Morrow, Chief of the Breast Service at Sloan-Kettering.

In spite of the new scientific evidence, medical centers, hospitals and doctors who either don’t know about this research or choose to ignore it for reasons of financial gain, will continue to rip out women’s axillary lymph nodes. In fact, some prominent institutions wouldn’t even take part in (the study), according to the authors. Surgeons particularly hope the ‘bad’ news (that lymph node surgery is unnecessary and harmful) will just goes away in time, as it often does in the medical industry. Besides, the mainstream media didn’t even report about this important study.

Women who had their axillary lymph nodes removed are more likely to suffer from a host of new health problems in the future. What’s worse, the chance for a real cure of their cancer is greatly reduced and a recurrence of cancer is more likely, because of it.

“Taken together, findings from these (and other) investigators provide strong evidence that patients undergoing partial mastectomy, whole-breast irradiation, and systemic therapy for early breast cancer with microscopic sentinel lymph node metastasis can be treated effectively and safely without axillary node dissection,” the researchers said.

The author of an editorial accompanying the study, Dr. Grant W. Carlson, professor of surgery at Winship Cancer Institute at Emory University bluntly said: “I have a feeling we’ve been doing a lot of harm (by routinely taking out many nodes).” But since not many doctors and patients pay attention to this admission by the good doctor, the “war on cancer patients” will continue with full force.

You may share or republish this article provided you clearly mention the name of Andreas Moritz and paste a hyper link back to the web page